Subject	i usally get like 25- 28 miles per gallon
Posted by	hfzman on May 15, 2006 at 12:02 AM
	This message has been viewed 17 times.
In Reply To	NA range (highway mpg) posted by gregtay on May 14, 2006 at 10:13 PM
Message	if driven in a decent manner, there is no reason you should get less than 23 or so, unless something is not right on your car.
Follow Ups	NA range (highway mpg) - gregtay 22:13:11 05/14/06 Best I ever did in my '90 NA was 19mpg (n/m) - Goose1451 22:17:17 05/14/06 Something wasn't right... - BradZ (FL) 22:46:00 05/14/06 same here. (n/m) - zmenon 01:52:58 05/15/06 Quick question to anyone... - Cincyzx 22:27:03 05/14/06 Then lever on the right of wheel, push down to set. (n/m) - Kez43 22:32:25 05/14/06 Lol wow do i feel stupid. - Cincyzx 22:34:59 05/14/06 25+ mpg if you keep it under mach 10. (n/m) - SactoTodd 22:37:32 05/14/06 25 mpg at 65 mph mixed flat and hills (n/m) - BillZ2+2 23:48:41 05/14/06 i usally get like 25- 28 miles per gallon - hfzman 00:02:50 05/15/06 I usually average 24 - MoeJoe649 00:32:47 05/15/06 my trip from tampa to seattle, i got 25 mpg steady... (n/m) - Mogili 01:33:05 05/15/06 Re: NA range (highway mpg) - Marty1Mc 07:53:46 05/15/06 20.5 +/- .2 commuting, 23-26 conservative hwy. w/ cruise > - my91z 08:27:48 05/15/06 budget for 300 miles a tank - Ballistic 08:27:52 05/15/06 ~25-27 hwy mpg for me. (n/m) - Medlin1(SWMO) 10:14:34 05/15/06 I averaged 24mpg at 80mph driving from CA to CO (n/m) - 300zx90 (CO) 10:50:51 05/15/06 I got 27+ mpg on my way to socal last summer. - Zluster(Sir Sam) 21:00:38 05/15/06
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.